國際反貪腐研討會
(International Anti-Corruption Conference, IACC)
國際反貪腐研討會是國際性非官方專業研討會，每兩年舉行一次。它是世界各國、各地區反貪污專家、學者深入研究此國際社會間普遍存在之問題與其對策的重要會議，也是各國和各地區司法人員、政府官員交流經驗、尋求國際合作以遏制貪污現象之重要場所。
宗旨:推動各國及各地區的反貪污工作，預防和懲治貪污犯罪，維護社會穩定和經濟發展。
1983年，第1屆IACC在美國華盛頓召開。由華盛頓哥倫比亞特區政府監察署主辦，會議主席為該署監察廳廳長。會議主題為：關於政府部門中之貪污和其他經濟犯罪。13個國家和地區的21個反貪污機構的代表出席了會議。
1985年10月，第2屆IACC在美國紐約召開。由紐約市調查局主辦，會議主席為該局專員。共有200多名代表出席了本次大會，其中60多名代表來自美國以外的32個國家。
1987年11月，第3屆IACC在香港舉行。由香港廉政公署舉辦，會議主席為廉署專員斯道偉。共有來自30多個國家的70個組織的250多名代表出席了會議。
1989年11月，第4屆IACC在澳洲召開。由澳檢察總署主辦。會議主席為澳副總理兼檢察總長。該次主題為：九十年代的反貪防貪策略。中國監察部派員參加。
1992年3月，第5屆IACC在荷蘭阿姆斯特丹舉行。由荷蘭警察與社會基金會主辦，主席為該基金會主任馮‧德‧斯泰格。會議主題為：面向未來；控制貪污的國際化趨勢。共有67個國家和地區以及聯合國、歐共體委員會等國際組織的284名代表出席了會議。中國最高人民檢察院派員與會，並提出申辦要求。
1993年11月，第6屆IACC在墨西哥坎昆舉行。由墨監察部主辦，會議主席為墨監察部部長巴斯克斯‧納瓦。來自60個國家和地區的340多名代表出席了會議，其中部長級代表20餘人。中國亦派監察部部長曹慶澤為團長、最高人民檢察院貪檢廳廳長羅輯為副團長的代表團與會。
1995年10月6日至10日，第7屆IACC於北京舉行。由中國最高人民檢察院和監察部聯合舉辦，主席為中國最高人民檢察院檢察長張思卿。89個國家和地區的900多名政府官員、法官、檢查官、律師、專家和教授等參加了大會，共收到論文252篇。大會主題是“反貪污與社會的穩定和發展。
1997年9月7日至11日，第8屆IACC在秘魯利馬舉行。來自80多個國家和地區的代表團以及一些國際機構的代表出席了會議。會議通過了利馬聲明，呼籲各國政府、國際組織和社會各界採取反對腐敗的具體行動，同心協力開展反貪行動，包括盡快批准UNCAC。
1999年10月10日至14日，第9屆IACC在南非德班召開。100多名來自世界各國和地區的代表出席了會議。
2001年10月7日至11日，第10屆於布拉格舉行。大會的主題是“共同打擊貪污腐敗——制定戰略、評估成果、改革機制”。來自140多個國家和地區的1300多名代表與會，由中國監察部派員參加。
2006第12屆11月15-18日，瓜地馬拉。
2008年10月30日至11月2日，第13屆國際反貪污大會在雅典舉行。來自世界各國和地區的1100多名政府官員、司法專業人士和學者參加了會議。大會的一大特點是將貪污問題與金融危機、氣候變化等議題加以聯繫。
2012於11月7日至11日巴西__第15屆國際反貪腐研討會（International Anti-Corruption Conference，簡稱ICAA）。
資料來源: http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/ziliao/2003-06/25/content_936419.htm
BY WANLI YANG
2012年10月22日 星期一
2012年6月19日 星期二
國際組織
人權之國際組織
國際律師組織 http://www.theworldlawgroup.com/
國際特赦組織 http://www.amnesty.org/
工作重點包括確保政治犯受到公平審判、廢除死刑及終結法外處決等。
國際人權聯合會http://www.ilhr.org/
總部設於紐約市
國際人權聯盟http://www.fidh.org/-francais-
目前聯盟和國際間 90多個國家中的114個人權組織有合作關係。
國際人權觀察組織http://www.hrw.org/
致力於維護人民政治自由、戰爭中人民避免受到虐待、避免人權受到迫害、挑戰利用非法活動侵犯人權的政府及其他人權保護行動。
國際法律人委員會http://www.icj.org/
工作包括影響聯合國或地區政府的政策制訂、訓練關心人權的法律人、對審判過程的觀察並維護公正審判。
國際智慧財產權組織http://www.wipo.int/portal/index.html.en
位於瑞士的日內瓦。參與推動許多國際間智慧財產相關的活動，同時也協助處理或仲裁相關的國際爭議糾紛。
反貪污國際組織
IACA
Ihe International Anti-Corruption Academy
http://www.iaca.int/
The International Anti-Corruption Academy (IACA) is an international organization as of 8 March 2011. A joint initiative by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), the Republic of Austria, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and other stakeholders, IACA is a pioneering institution that aims to overcome current shortcomings in knowledge and practice in the field of anti-corruption.
2012.6.19
Wan-Li Yang
整理
國際律師組織 http://www.theworldlawgroup.com/
國際特赦組織 http://www.amnesty.org/
工作重點包括確保政治犯受到公平審判、廢除死刑及終結法外處決等。
國際人權聯合會http://www.ilhr.org/
總部設於紐約市
國際人權聯盟http://www.fidh.org/-francais-
目前聯盟和國際間 90多個國家中的114個人權組織有合作關係。
國際人權觀察組織http://www.hrw.org/
致力於維護人民政治自由、戰爭中人民避免受到虐待、避免人權受到迫害、挑戰利用非法活動侵犯人權的政府及其他人權保護行動。
國際法律人委員會http://www.icj.org/
工作包括影響聯合國或地區政府的政策制訂、訓練關心人權的法律人、對審判過程的觀察並維護公正審判。
國際智慧財產權組織http://www.wipo.int/portal/index.html.en
位於瑞士的日內瓦。參與推動許多國際間智慧財產相關的活動，同時也協助處理或仲裁相關的國際爭議糾紛。
反貪污國際組織
IACA
Ihe International Anti-Corruption Academy
http://www.iaca.int/
The International Anti-Corruption Academy (IACA) is an international organization as of 8 March 2011. A joint initiative by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), the Republic of Austria, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and other stakeholders, IACA is a pioneering institution that aims to overcome current shortcomings in knowledge and practice in the field of anti-corruption.
2012.6.19
Wan-Li Yang
整理
2011年7月23日 星期六
CGU 巴西反貪機構
The CGU
巴西的反貪與國際合作機構
The Office of the Comptroller General (CGU) is the agency of the Federal Government in charge of assisting the President of the Republic in matters which, within the Executive Branch, are related to defending public assets and enhancing management transparency through internal control activities, public audits, corrective and disciplinary measures, corruption prevention and combat, and coordinating ombudsman's activities.
As a central agency, CGU is also in charge of technically supervising all the departments making up the Internal Control System, the Disciplinary System, and the ombudsman's units of the Federal Executive Branch, providing normative guidance as required.
the site of CGU is:
http://www.cgu.gov.br/english/default.asp
巴西的反貪與國際合作機構
The Office of the Comptroller General (CGU) is the agency of the Federal Government in charge of assisting the President of the Republic in matters which, within the Executive Branch, are related to defending public assets and enhancing management transparency through internal control activities, public audits, corrective and disciplinary measures, corruption prevention and combat, and coordinating ombudsman's activities.
As a central agency, CGU is also in charge of technically supervising all the departments making up the Internal Control System, the Disciplinary System, and the ombudsman's units of the Federal Executive Branch, providing normative guidance as required.
the site of CGU is:
http://www.cgu.gov.br/english/default.asp
2010年10月8日 星期五
Integrity and Ethics Directions for Civil Servants
Integrity and Ethics Directions for Civil Servants
公務員廉政倫理規範
1. The Executive Yuan (hereinafter referred as “the Yuan”) has set the Directions specifically for guiding the civil servants to execute duties with integrity, fairness and lawful administration, which shall improve the Government's image of integrity.
2. The terminologies used under this Directions are defined as follows:
(1) “Civil servant” refers to personnel applicable to the “Civil Service Act.”
(2) “Interest to the duty” refers to one of the following situations between the individual, legal person, organization or other unit with the Authority or subordinate authority:
1. Relationship of business transaction, supervision or subsidy.
2. Relationship of searching, proceeding or completed setting of contract, trading or other agreements.
3. Other incidence that will receive beneficial or adverse influence due to decision, execution or non-execution of business under the Authority.
(3) “Normal standard of social etiquette” refers to social interaction between common people with market value under NT$3,000 (Three Thousand New Taiwan Dollars Only). The gift received from the same source in the same year is limited to NT$10,000 (Ten Thousand New Taiwan Dollars Only).
(4) “Civil service etiquette” refers to activity made according to politeness, habit or custom during domestic (foreign) interview, foreign guest reception, promotion, communication and coordination based on civil requirements.
(5) “Entreating or lobbying” refers to the action take for content of certain matter involves with decision, execution or non-execution of practical business under the Authority or subordinate authority, which may cause illegal or improper concern that might affect specific rights and duties.
3. The civil servants shall follow laws to execute duties impartially and base on the public interests. The attempt to gain improper benefit for oneself or third party via occupational power, method and opportunity is prohibited.
4. The civil servants may not request, make expected agreement of or receive gift from person of material interest to such servant's duty. However, the gift can be accepted under any of the following situation that is occasional and not affecting the specific right and duty:
(1) Civil etiquette.
(2) Bonus, assistance or consolation from the supervisor.
(3) The market value of gift received shall be less than NT$500 (Five Hundred New Taiwan Dollars Only). For gift to multi personnel in the Authority, the total market value shall be less than NT$1,000 (One Thousand New Taiwan Dollars Only).
(4) Gift with market value less than normal standard of social etiquette, which is given for engagement, marriage, birth, moving (to new residence), inauguration, promoted transfer, retirement, resignation, separation, as well as injury, illness or death of the personnel, spouse or immediate relative.
5. Upon occurrence of civil servant receiving gift, the matter shall be processed according to following procedures:
(1) Except for exceptions mentioned above, gift with material interest to the duty shall be rejected or returned, as well as reported to the supervisor and notified to the Government Employee Ethics Units. If return of gift is not possible, the matter shall be transferred to the Government Employee Ethics Units for process within 3 days since the date of receipt.
(2) Except for relatives or friends of usual contact, gift without material interest to the duty but exceeding normal standard of social etiquette in market value shall be reported to the supervisor within 3 days since the date of receipt. If necessary, the matter shall be notified to the Government Employee Ethics Units.
Each Government Employee Ethics Units shall propose methods of receipt, nationalization, transfer to charity agencies (institutes) or other adequate suggestions depending on the property and value of gift, which is executed after reporting to the Director of Agency for approval.
6. The following situations are deemed as gift received by the civil servant:
(1) Gift received in the name of civil servant’s spouse, immediate relative by blood, family members of common property and residence.
(2) Gift received via third parted and then transferred to the civil servant or person mentioned above.
7. The civil servant may not attend social gathering with material interest to his/her duty except for and not limited to one of the following incidences:
(1) The attendance is necessary due to civil etiquette.
(2) The event is held due to traditional festival and open to the public.
(3) Bonus or recognition from the supervisor.
(4) The event is held for engagement, marriage, birth, moving (to new residence), inauguration, promoted transfer, retirement, resignation, separation and not exceeding normal standard of social etiquette.
Although the social gathering has no material interest to the civil duty, the civil servant shall still avoid such event if not appropriate to the identity and duty.
8. In case of inspection, investigation, business trip or conference, the civil servant may not accept dinning or gathering invitation from relevant agency other than necessary meals, accommodation and transportation during execution of civil affairs unless necessary.
9. In occurrence of situation stated under Subparagraph 1 or 2, Paragraph 1, Point 7, the civil servant can only attend such event after reporting to the supervisor for approval and notifying the Government Employee Ethics Units.
10. Upon entreating or lobbying, the civil servant shall report to the supervisor and notify the Government Employee Ethics Units within 3 days.
11. After receiving notification of gift, social gathering, entreating or lobbying or other matters related to the integrity and ethics, the Government Employee Ethics Units of each agency shall register and create a new file immediately.
12. Unless required by the law otherwise, the civil servant may not take other part-time job of civil service or business.
13. For civil servant that attend event such as speech, symposium, seminar and judging, the hourly remuneration received may not exceed NT$5,000 (Five Thousand New Taiwan Dollars Only).
For civil servant that attend event mentioned above, the additional document fees received may not exceed NT$2,000 (Two Thousand New Taiwan Dollars Only).
If the event attended is held or invited by party with material interest to the duty, the civil servant can only attend such event after reporting to the supervisor for approval and notifying the Government Employee Ethics Units for registration.
14. In respect to the requirement under the Directions for reporting to the supervisor and notifying the Government Employee Ethics Units, the Director of the agency shall notify the Government Employee Ethics Units himself/herself.
15. The civil servant shall strive to avoid involvement of monetary loan, gathering invitation or participation, as well as property or identity guarantor. If necessary, the Government Employee Ethics Units shall be notified.
The agency directors and unit supervisors shall enhance the audit on subordinates’ ethics. Finding of abnormal finance or living shall be reacted and processed immediately.
16. The Government Employee Ethics Units of each agency shall assign specific personnel to undertake explanation of the Directions and case description, as well as providing other ethics and integrity consultation services. Any doubt occurs during the consultation shall be reported to the higher level of Government Employee Ethics Units for process.
The higher level of Government Employee Ethics Units mentioned above refers to the Government Employee Ethics Units of agency directly above the agency that accepts the consultation. The agency without higher authority will execute the power of higher agency regulated by the Directions.
The agency without higher authority refers to the first level agencies.
17. For matters specified under the Directions to be processed by the Government Employee Ethics Units, if such unit is not provided, the matter shall be processed by the personnel that is concurrently in charge with the ethic affairs or appointed by the Director.
18. The civil servant violating the Directions and verified to be true after investigation will receive punishment according to relevant regulations. If criminal liability is involved, the matter will be transferred to the justice unit for prosecution.
19. Each unit may set stricter regulations on various standards set under the Directions and other matters of integrity and ethics depending on the necessity.
20. Other central and local authorities outside of the Yuan may apply regulations of the Directions.
公務員廉政倫理規範
1. The Executive Yuan (hereinafter referred as “the Yuan”) has set the Directions specifically for guiding the civil servants to execute duties with integrity, fairness and lawful administration, which shall improve the Government's image of integrity.
2. The terminologies used under this Directions are defined as follows:
(1) “Civil servant” refers to personnel applicable to the “Civil Service Act.”
(2) “Interest to the duty” refers to one of the following situations between the individual, legal person, organization or other unit with the Authority or subordinate authority:
1. Relationship of business transaction, supervision or subsidy.
2. Relationship of searching, proceeding or completed setting of contract, trading or other agreements.
3. Other incidence that will receive beneficial or adverse influence due to decision, execution or non-execution of business under the Authority.
(3) “Normal standard of social etiquette” refers to social interaction between common people with market value under NT$3,000 (Three Thousand New Taiwan Dollars Only). The gift received from the same source in the same year is limited to NT$10,000 (Ten Thousand New Taiwan Dollars Only).
(4) “Civil service etiquette” refers to activity made according to politeness, habit or custom during domestic (foreign) interview, foreign guest reception, promotion, communication and coordination based on civil requirements.
(5) “Entreating or lobbying” refers to the action take for content of certain matter involves with decision, execution or non-execution of practical business under the Authority or subordinate authority, which may cause illegal or improper concern that might affect specific rights and duties.
3. The civil servants shall follow laws to execute duties impartially and base on the public interests. The attempt to gain improper benefit for oneself or third party via occupational power, method and opportunity is prohibited.
4. The civil servants may not request, make expected agreement of or receive gift from person of material interest to such servant's duty. However, the gift can be accepted under any of the following situation that is occasional and not affecting the specific right and duty:
(1) Civil etiquette.
(2) Bonus, assistance or consolation from the supervisor.
(3) The market value of gift received shall be less than NT$500 (Five Hundred New Taiwan Dollars Only). For gift to multi personnel in the Authority, the total market value shall be less than NT$1,000 (One Thousand New Taiwan Dollars Only).
(4) Gift with market value less than normal standard of social etiquette, which is given for engagement, marriage, birth, moving (to new residence), inauguration, promoted transfer, retirement, resignation, separation, as well as injury, illness or death of the personnel, spouse or immediate relative.
5. Upon occurrence of civil servant receiving gift, the matter shall be processed according to following procedures:
(1) Except for exceptions mentioned above, gift with material interest to the duty shall be rejected or returned, as well as reported to the supervisor and notified to the Government Employee Ethics Units. If return of gift is not possible, the matter shall be transferred to the Government Employee Ethics Units for process within 3 days since the date of receipt.
(2) Except for relatives or friends of usual contact, gift without material interest to the duty but exceeding normal standard of social etiquette in market value shall be reported to the supervisor within 3 days since the date of receipt. If necessary, the matter shall be notified to the Government Employee Ethics Units.
Each Government Employee Ethics Units shall propose methods of receipt, nationalization, transfer to charity agencies (institutes) or other adequate suggestions depending on the property and value of gift, which is executed after reporting to the Director of Agency for approval.
6. The following situations are deemed as gift received by the civil servant:
(1) Gift received in the name of civil servant’s spouse, immediate relative by blood, family members of common property and residence.
(2) Gift received via third parted and then transferred to the civil servant or person mentioned above.
7. The civil servant may not attend social gathering with material interest to his/her duty except for and not limited to one of the following incidences:
(1) The attendance is necessary due to civil etiquette.
(2) The event is held due to traditional festival and open to the public.
(3) Bonus or recognition from the supervisor.
(4) The event is held for engagement, marriage, birth, moving (to new residence), inauguration, promoted transfer, retirement, resignation, separation and not exceeding normal standard of social etiquette.
Although the social gathering has no material interest to the civil duty, the civil servant shall still avoid such event if not appropriate to the identity and duty.
8. In case of inspection, investigation, business trip or conference, the civil servant may not accept dinning or gathering invitation from relevant agency other than necessary meals, accommodation and transportation during execution of civil affairs unless necessary.
9. In occurrence of situation stated under Subparagraph 1 or 2, Paragraph 1, Point 7, the civil servant can only attend such event after reporting to the supervisor for approval and notifying the Government Employee Ethics Units.
10. Upon entreating or lobbying, the civil servant shall report to the supervisor and notify the Government Employee Ethics Units within 3 days.
11. After receiving notification of gift, social gathering, entreating or lobbying or other matters related to the integrity and ethics, the Government Employee Ethics Units of each agency shall register and create a new file immediately.
12. Unless required by the law otherwise, the civil servant may not take other part-time job of civil service or business.
13. For civil servant that attend event such as speech, symposium, seminar and judging, the hourly remuneration received may not exceed NT$5,000 (Five Thousand New Taiwan Dollars Only).
For civil servant that attend event mentioned above, the additional document fees received may not exceed NT$2,000 (Two Thousand New Taiwan Dollars Only).
If the event attended is held or invited by party with material interest to the duty, the civil servant can only attend such event after reporting to the supervisor for approval and notifying the Government Employee Ethics Units for registration.
14. In respect to the requirement under the Directions for reporting to the supervisor and notifying the Government Employee Ethics Units, the Director of the agency shall notify the Government Employee Ethics Units himself/herself.
15. The civil servant shall strive to avoid involvement of monetary loan, gathering invitation or participation, as well as property or identity guarantor. If necessary, the Government Employee Ethics Units shall be notified.
The agency directors and unit supervisors shall enhance the audit on subordinates’ ethics. Finding of abnormal finance or living shall be reacted and processed immediately.
16. The Government Employee Ethics Units of each agency shall assign specific personnel to undertake explanation of the Directions and case description, as well as providing other ethics and integrity consultation services. Any doubt occurs during the consultation shall be reported to the higher level of Government Employee Ethics Units for process.
The higher level of Government Employee Ethics Units mentioned above refers to the Government Employee Ethics Units of agency directly above the agency that accepts the consultation. The agency without higher authority will execute the power of higher agency regulated by the Directions.
The agency without higher authority refers to the first level agencies.
17. For matters specified under the Directions to be processed by the Government Employee Ethics Units, if such unit is not provided, the matter shall be processed by the personnel that is concurrently in charge with the ethic affairs or appointed by the Director.
18. The civil servant violating the Directions and verified to be true after investigation will receive punishment according to relevant regulations. If criminal liability is involved, the matter will be transferred to the justice unit for prosecution.
19. Each unit may set stricter regulations on various standards set under the Directions and other matters of integrity and ethics depending on the necessity.
20. Other central and local authorities outside of the Yuan may apply regulations of the Directions.
2010年9月17日 星期五
公務員廉政倫理規範
公務員廉政倫理規範
1.中華民國九十七年六月二十六日行政院院臺法字第 0970087013 號函訂定發布全文20點；並定自九十七年八月ㄧ日生效
2.中華民國九十九年七月三十日行政院院臺法字第0990040576號函修正公布全文21點，並自即日生效
一、行政院（以下簡稱本院）為使所屬公務員執行職務，廉潔自持、公正無私及依法行政，並提升政府之清廉形象，特訂定本規範。
二、本規範用詞，定義如下：
（一）公務員：指適用公務員服務法之人員。
（二）與其職務有利害關係：指個人、法人、團體或其他單位與本機關（構）或其所屬機關（構）間，具有下列情形之一者：
1、業務往來、指揮監督或費用補(獎）助等關係。
2、正在尋求、進行或已訂立承攬、買賣或其他契約關係。
3、其他因本機關（構）業務之決定、執行或不執行，將遭受有利或不利之影響。
（三）正常社交禮俗標準：指一般人社交往來，市價不超過新臺幣三千元者。但同一年度來自同一來源受贈財物以新臺幣一萬元為限。
（四）公務禮儀：指基於公務需要，在國內（外）訪問、接待外賓、推動業務及溝通協調時，依禮貌、慣例或習俗所為之活動。
（五）請託關說：指其內容涉及本機關（構）或所屬機關（構）業務具體事項之決定、執行或不執行，且因該事項之決定、執行或不執行致有違法或不當而影響特定權利義務之虞。
三、公務員應依法公正執行職務，以公共利益為依歸，不得假借職務上之權力、方法、機會圖本人或第三人不正之利益。
四、公務員不得要求、期約或收受與其職務有利害關係者餽贈財物。但有下列情形之一，且係偶發而無影響特定權利義務之虞時，得受贈之：
（一）屬公務禮儀。
（二）長官之獎勵、救助或慰問。
（三）受贈之財物市價在新臺幣五百元以下；或對本機關（構）內多數人為餽贈，其市價總額在新臺幣一千元以下。
（四）因訂婚、結婚、生育、喬遷、就職、陞遷異動、退休、辭職、離職及本人、配偶或直系親屬之傷病、死亡受贈之財物，其市價不超過正常社交禮俗標準。
五、公務員遇有受贈財物情事，應依下列程序處理：
（一）與其職務有利害關係者所為之餽贈，除前點但書規定之情形外，應予拒絕或退還，並簽報其長官及知會政風機構；無法退還時，應於受贈之日起三日內，交政風機構處理。
（二）除親屬或經常交往朋友外，與其無職務上利害關係者所為之餽贈，市價超過正常社交禮俗標準時，應於受贈之日起三日內，簽報其長官，必要時並知會政風機構。
各機關（構）之政風機構應視受贈財物之性質及價值，提出付費收受、歸公、轉贈慈善機構或其他適當建議，簽報機關首長核定後執行。
六、下列情形推定為公務員之受贈財物：
（一）以公務員配偶、直系血親、同財共居家屬之名義收受者。
（二）藉由第三人收受後轉交公務員本人或前款之人者。
七、公務員不得參加與其職務有利害關係者之飲宴應酬。但有下列情形之ㄧ者，不在此限：
（一）因公務禮儀確有必要參加。
（二）因民俗節慶公開舉辦之活動且邀請一般人參加。
（三）屬長官對屬員之獎勵、慰勞。
（四）因訂婚、結婚、生育、喬遷、就職、陞遷異動、退休、辭職、離職等所舉辦之活動，而未超過正常社交禮俗標準。
公務員受邀之飲宴應酬，雖與其無職務上利害關係，而與其身分、職務顯不相宜者，仍應避免。
八、公務員除因公務需要經報請長官同意，或有其他正當理由者外，不得涉足不妥當之場所。
公務員不得與其職務有利害關係之相關人員為不當接觸。
九、公務員於視察、調查、出差或參加會議等活動時，不得在茶點及執行公務確有必要之簡便食宿、交通以外接受相關機關（構）飲宴或其他應酬活動。
十、公務員遇有第七點第一項第一款或第二款情形，應簽報長官核准並知會政風機構後始得參加。
十一、公務員遇有請託關說時，應於三日內簽報其長官並知會政風機構。
十二、各機關（構）之政風機構受理受贈財物、飲宴應酬、請託關說或其他涉及廉政倫理事件之知會或通知後，應即登錄建檔。
十三、公務員除依法令規定外，不得兼任其他公職或業務。
十四、公務員出席演講、座談、研習及評審（選）等活動，支領鐘點費每小時不得超過新臺幣五千元。
公務員參加前項活動，另有支領稿費者，每千字不得超過新臺幣二千元。
公務員參加第一項活動，如屬與其職務有利害關係者籌辦或邀請，應先簽報其長官核准及知會政風機構登錄後始得前往。
十五、本規範所定應知會政風機構並簽報其長官之規定，於機關（構）首長，應逕行通知政風機構。
十六、公務員應儘量避免金錢借貸、邀集或參與合會、擔任財物或身分之保證人。如確有必要者，應知會政風機構。
機關（構）首長及單位主管應加強對屬員之品德操守考核，發現有財務異常、生活違常者，應立即反應及處理。
十七、各機關（構）之政風機構應指派專人，負責本規範之解釋、個案說明及提供其他廉政倫理諮詢服務。受理諮詢業務，如有疑義得送請上一級政風機構處理。
前項所稱上一級政風機構，指受理諮詢機關（構）直屬之上一級機關政風機構，其無上級機關者，由該機關（構）執行本規範所規定上級機關之職權。
前項所稱無上級機關者，指本院所屬各一級機關。
十八、本規範所定應由政風機構處理之事項，於未設政風機構者，由兼辦政風業務人員或其首長指定之人員處理。
十九、公務員違反本規範經查證屬實者，依相關規定懲處；其涉及刑事責任者，移送司法機關辦理。
二十、各機關(構)得視需要，對本規範所定之各項標準及其他廉政倫理事項，訂定更嚴格之規範。
二十一、本院以外其他中央及地方機關（構），得準用本規範之規定。
1.中華民國九十七年六月二十六日行政院院臺法字第 0970087013 號函訂定發布全文20點；並定自九十七年八月ㄧ日生效
2.中華民國九十九年七月三十日行政院院臺法字第0990040576號函修正公布全文21點，並自即日生效
一、行政院（以下簡稱本院）為使所屬公務員執行職務，廉潔自持、公正無私及依法行政，並提升政府之清廉形象，特訂定本規範。
二、本規範用詞，定義如下：
（一）公務員：指適用公務員服務法之人員。
（二）與其職務有利害關係：指個人、法人、團體或其他單位與本機關（構）或其所屬機關（構）間，具有下列情形之一者：
1、業務往來、指揮監督或費用補(獎）助等關係。
2、正在尋求、進行或已訂立承攬、買賣或其他契約關係。
3、其他因本機關（構）業務之決定、執行或不執行，將遭受有利或不利之影響。
（三）正常社交禮俗標準：指一般人社交往來，市價不超過新臺幣三千元者。但同一年度來自同一來源受贈財物以新臺幣一萬元為限。
（四）公務禮儀：指基於公務需要，在國內（外）訪問、接待外賓、推動業務及溝通協調時，依禮貌、慣例或習俗所為之活動。
（五）請託關說：指其內容涉及本機關（構）或所屬機關（構）業務具體事項之決定、執行或不執行，且因該事項之決定、執行或不執行致有違法或不當而影響特定權利義務之虞。
三、公務員應依法公正執行職務，以公共利益為依歸，不得假借職務上之權力、方法、機會圖本人或第三人不正之利益。
四、公務員不得要求、期約或收受與其職務有利害關係者餽贈財物。但有下列情形之一，且係偶發而無影響特定權利義務之虞時，得受贈之：
（一）屬公務禮儀。
（二）長官之獎勵、救助或慰問。
（三）受贈之財物市價在新臺幣五百元以下；或對本機關（構）內多數人為餽贈，其市價總額在新臺幣一千元以下。
（四）因訂婚、結婚、生育、喬遷、就職、陞遷異動、退休、辭職、離職及本人、配偶或直系親屬之傷病、死亡受贈之財物，其市價不超過正常社交禮俗標準。
五、公務員遇有受贈財物情事，應依下列程序處理：
（一）與其職務有利害關係者所為之餽贈，除前點但書規定之情形外，應予拒絕或退還，並簽報其長官及知會政風機構；無法退還時，應於受贈之日起三日內，交政風機構處理。
（二）除親屬或經常交往朋友外，與其無職務上利害關係者所為之餽贈，市價超過正常社交禮俗標準時，應於受贈之日起三日內，簽報其長官，必要時並知會政風機構。
各機關（構）之政風機構應視受贈財物之性質及價值，提出付費收受、歸公、轉贈慈善機構或其他適當建議，簽報機關首長核定後執行。
六、下列情形推定為公務員之受贈財物：
（一）以公務員配偶、直系血親、同財共居家屬之名義收受者。
（二）藉由第三人收受後轉交公務員本人或前款之人者。
七、公務員不得參加與其職務有利害關係者之飲宴應酬。但有下列情形之ㄧ者，不在此限：
（一）因公務禮儀確有必要參加。
（二）因民俗節慶公開舉辦之活動且邀請一般人參加。
（三）屬長官對屬員之獎勵、慰勞。
（四）因訂婚、結婚、生育、喬遷、就職、陞遷異動、退休、辭職、離職等所舉辦之活動，而未超過正常社交禮俗標準。
公務員受邀之飲宴應酬，雖與其無職務上利害關係，而與其身分、職務顯不相宜者，仍應避免。
八、公務員除因公務需要經報請長官同意，或有其他正當理由者外，不得涉足不妥當之場所。
公務員不得與其職務有利害關係之相關人員為不當接觸。
九、公務員於視察、調查、出差或參加會議等活動時，不得在茶點及執行公務確有必要之簡便食宿、交通以外接受相關機關（構）飲宴或其他應酬活動。
十、公務員遇有第七點第一項第一款或第二款情形，應簽報長官核准並知會政風機構後始得參加。
十一、公務員遇有請託關說時，應於三日內簽報其長官並知會政風機構。
十二、各機關（構）之政風機構受理受贈財物、飲宴應酬、請託關說或其他涉及廉政倫理事件之知會或通知後，應即登錄建檔。
十三、公務員除依法令規定外，不得兼任其他公職或業務。
十四、公務員出席演講、座談、研習及評審（選）等活動，支領鐘點費每小時不得超過新臺幣五千元。
公務員參加前項活動，另有支領稿費者，每千字不得超過新臺幣二千元。
公務員參加第一項活動，如屬與其職務有利害關係者籌辦或邀請，應先簽報其長官核准及知會政風機構登錄後始得前往。
十五、本規範所定應知會政風機構並簽報其長官之規定，於機關（構）首長，應逕行通知政風機構。
十六、公務員應儘量避免金錢借貸、邀集或參與合會、擔任財物或身分之保證人。如確有必要者，應知會政風機構。
機關（構）首長及單位主管應加強對屬員之品德操守考核，發現有財務異常、生活違常者，應立即反應及處理。
十七、各機關（構）之政風機構應指派專人，負責本規範之解釋、個案說明及提供其他廉政倫理諮詢服務。受理諮詢業務，如有疑義得送請上一級政風機構處理。
前項所稱上一級政風機構，指受理諮詢機關（構）直屬之上一級機關政風機構，其無上級機關者，由該機關（構）執行本規範所規定上級機關之職權。
前項所稱無上級機關者，指本院所屬各一級機關。
十八、本規範所定應由政風機構處理之事項，於未設政風機構者，由兼辦政風業務人員或其首長指定之人員處理。
十九、公務員違反本規範經查證屬實者，依相關規定懲處；其涉及刑事責任者，移送司法機關辦理。
二十、各機關(構)得視需要，對本規範所定之各項標準及其他廉政倫理事項，訂定更嚴格之規範。
二十一、本院以外其他中央及地方機關（構），得準用本規範之規定。
2010年2月24日 星期三
Anti-Corruption and Transparency Expert Task Force (ACT) 2
Codes of Conduct for public servants
Country：Chinese TaipeiRelated Agency：Department of Government Employee Ethics (MOJ)(法務部政風司)
Coverage：Civil servants
Web Location: http://law.moj.gov.tw/
Law:
Anti-corruption Act (貪污治罪條例)
(the provision of the Penalties for Unaccounted-for Assets has been added into the Anti-corruption Act )
http://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=C0000007
Public Service Act [Ethics Directions for Civil Servants (公務員服務法)]
Labbying Law (遊說法)
The Conflict of Interest Law [ the Act on Recusal of Public Servants Due to Conflicts of Interest 2000.7.12 (公職人員利益衝突迴避法) ]
http://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=I0070008
Act on Property-Declaration by Public Servants 1993.7.2 (公職人員財產申報法 )http://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=I0070005
the Act on Discipline of Civil Servants (公務員懲戒法)
the Political Donations Act 2004.3.31 (政治獻金法) 2010.1.27 amended
http://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=D0020049
the Access to Government Information Law
公務人員行政中立法
rule/ Standard:
the Integrity and Ethics Directions for Civil Servants on August 1, 2007, 公務員廉政倫理規範(廉政倫理事件登錄 遭受贈 飲宴 遊說等之登錄)
By Wan-Li Yang Feb 24,2010.
Country：Chinese TaipeiRelated Agency：Department of Government Employee Ethics (MOJ)(法務部政風司)
Coverage：Civil servants
Web Location: http://law.moj.gov.tw/
Law:
Anti-corruption Act (貪污治罪條例)
(the provision of the Penalties for Unaccounted-for Assets has been added into the Anti-corruption Act )
http://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=C0000007
Public Service Act [Ethics Directions for Civil Servants (公務員服務法)]
Labbying Law (遊說法)
The Conflict of Interest Law [ the Act on Recusal of Public Servants Due to Conflicts of Interest 2000.7.12 (公職人員利益衝突迴避法) ]
http://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=I0070008
Act on Property-Declaration by Public Servants 1993.7.2 (公職人員財產申報法 )http://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=I0070005
the Act on Discipline of Civil Servants (公務員懲戒法)
the Political Donations Act 2004.3.31 (政治獻金法) 2010.1.27 amended
http://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=D0020049
the Access to Government Information Law
公務人員行政中立法
rule/ Standard:
the Integrity and Ethics Directions for Civil Servants on August 1, 2007, 公務員廉政倫理規範(廉政倫理事件登錄 遭受贈 飲宴 遊說等之登錄)
By Wan-Li Yang Feb 24,2010.
2009年4月10日 星期五
White Collar Crime Research Resources
White Collar Crime Research Resources
1. National White Collar Crime Center:
http://www.nw3c.org/overview/what_we_do.cfm
NW3C is a US non-profit membership organization that has been continuously funded through competitive grants for over three decades. Through a combination of training and critical support services, they equip state, local, Tribal and federal law enforcement agencies with skills and resources they need to tackle emerging economic and cybercrime problems.
For the US public, NW3C provides information and research so they too may become proactive in the prevention of economic and cyber crime. Victims of crimes can rely on NW3C to help them register Internet crime complaints through their website at www.ic3.gov and notify the appropriate authorities at local, state, and federal levels promptly, accurately, and securely.
2. White Collar Crime Research Consortium (WCCRC):
http://www.nw3c.org/research/white_collar_crime_consortium.cfm
The mission of WCCRC is to promote increased US public awareness of the impact and burden of white collar crime on society through dedicated research. NW3C established the WCCRC and continues to provide support to its efforts.
NW3C Economic and High-Tech Crime Papers, Publications, Reports
http://www.nw3c.org/research/site_files.cfm?mode=p
3. The World Bank Publications and Research on Governance and Anti-Corruption
http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/WBI/EXTWBIGOVANTCOR/0,,contentMDK:20673872~menuPK:1740557~pagePK:64168445~piPK:64168309~theSitePK:1740530,00.html
Research conducted at the WB Institute in Governance and Anti-corruption, often in collaboration with Bank Operations and/or outside academic institutions, contributes to the growing literature on the subject and is a key input to the learning products and action program formulation. The emphasis is on the concrete operationalization of new research findings, based on novel empirical approaches and a major effort to develop a worldwide database on governance indicators.
4. The World Bank Database on Governance and Anti-Corruption:
http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/WBI/EXTWBIGOVANTCOR/0,,contentMDK:20673879~menuPK:1742423~pagePK:64168445~piPK:64168309~theSitePK:1740530,00.html
5. OECD section on Fighting Corruption:
www.oecd.org/corruption
Corruption threatens good governance, sustainable development, democratic process, and fair business practices. The OECD is a global leader in the fight against corruption, taking a multidisciplinary approach to combating corruption in business via the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, taxation, development aid, and governance in its member countries and beyond. Regional anti-corruption programs help the OECD reach out globally to curb corruption.
Statistics: http://www.oecd.org/statisticsdata/0,3381,en_2649_37447_1_119656_1_1_37447,00.html
Publications and Documents:
http://www.oecd.org/findDocument/0,3354,en_2649_37447_1_1_1_1_37447,00.html
1. National White Collar Crime Center:
http://www.nw3c.org/overview/what_we_do.cfm
NW3C is a US non-profit membership organization that has been continuously funded through competitive grants for over three decades. Through a combination of training and critical support services, they equip state, local, Tribal and federal law enforcement agencies with skills and resources they need to tackle emerging economic and cybercrime problems.
For the US public, NW3C provides information and research so they too may become proactive in the prevention of economic and cyber crime. Victims of crimes can rely on NW3C to help them register Internet crime complaints through their website at www.ic3.gov and notify the appropriate authorities at local, state, and federal levels promptly, accurately, and securely.
2. White Collar Crime Research Consortium (WCCRC):
http://www.nw3c.org/research/white_collar_crime_consortium.cfm
The mission of WCCRC is to promote increased US public awareness of the impact and burden of white collar crime on society through dedicated research. NW3C established the WCCRC and continues to provide support to its efforts.
NW3C Economic and High-Tech Crime Papers, Publications, Reports
http://www.nw3c.org/research/site_files.cfm?mode=p
3. The World Bank Publications and Research on Governance and Anti-Corruption
http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/WBI/EXTWBIGOVANTCOR/0,,contentMDK:20673872~menuPK:1740557~pagePK:64168445~piPK:64168309~theSitePK:1740530,00.html
Research conducted at the WB Institute in Governance and Anti-corruption, often in collaboration with Bank Operations and/or outside academic institutions, contributes to the growing literature on the subject and is a key input to the learning products and action program formulation. The emphasis is on the concrete operationalization of new research findings, based on novel empirical approaches and a major effort to develop a worldwide database on governance indicators.
4. The World Bank Database on Governance and Anti-Corruption:
http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/WBI/EXTWBIGOVANTCOR/0,,contentMDK:20673879~menuPK:1742423~pagePK:64168445~piPK:64168309~theSitePK:1740530,00.html
5. OECD section on Fighting Corruption:
www.oecd.org/corruption
Corruption threatens good governance, sustainable development, democratic process, and fair business practices. The OECD is a global leader in the fight against corruption, taking a multidisciplinary approach to combating corruption in business via the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, taxation, development aid, and governance in its member countries and beyond. Regional anti-corruption programs help the OECD reach out globally to curb corruption.
Statistics: http://www.oecd.org/statisticsdata/0,3381,en_2649_37447_1_119656_1_1_37447,00.html
Publications and Documents:
http://www.oecd.org/findDocument/0,3354,en_2649_37447_1_1_1_1_37447,00.html
2009年1月16日 星期五
Anti-Corruption and Transparency Expert Task Force (ACT)
APEC's Anti-Corruption and Transparency Expert Task Force (ACT) is made up of law enforcement officials from APEC member economies. ACT Task Force
1.Korea 韓國: KICAC Korean Independent Commission against Corruption
http://www.kicac.go.kr/PORTAL/Eng/index.jsp
南韓廉政公署 根據2001.1.7反貪污法，南韓廉政公署於2002.1.25成立。南韓廉政公署共有九位委員，並由其中一人擔任主席。九位委員分別由總統、國會及最高法院首席法官各舉薦三人出任，每人任期三年，之後可獲委連任。南韓廉政公署的行政與運作由秘書處負責，其下設有政策規劃處、公共關係及協作局、舉報審查局及15個其他部門。目前，南韓廉政公署的僱員合共139人。
南韓廉政公署是一個獨立運作的機構，以不偏不倚的態度致力防止貪污。工作範圍包括處理貪污舉報、研究體制改革措施、制定反貪政策及評估其成效，以及舉辦教育及宣傳活動。
南韓廉政公署的網站 (http://www.kicac.go.kr/)。
積極參與國際反貪工作。2002.11南韓廉政公署主辦了首屆「反貪機構研討會」，與來自澳洲、香港、馬來西亞及新加坡的反貪機構代表，分享打擊貪污的經驗和心得。
「亞太經合組織會議2005」於韓國舉行。為了把反貪議題納入APEC議程，南韓廉政公署於是建議在2005召開首次「反貪專家小組會議」(ACT)。亞太經合組織成員國領袖於2003年的領袖宣言中，承諾會致力提高透明度及打擊貪污；各成員國大可利用「反貪專家小組會議」的機會，商討實現承諾的方法。
2. Thailand 泰國 :NCCC, Thailand National Counter Corruption Commission (NCCC)
http://www.icac.org.hk/newsl/issue22eng/button2.htm
3.Singapore 新加坡:Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau http://app.cpib.gov.sg/newcpib/user/default.aspx?pgID=21
4.Malaysia 馬來西亞: the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC)
Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission - Wikipedia, the free ...
證人保護法相關法案:
The Whistleblower Protection Act 2010, formulated to curb corruption, had been implemented on December 15 2010. 證人保護法英文全文： http://www.bheuu.gov.my/pdf/Akta/Act%20711.pdf
5.Indonesia 印尼 : Corruption Eradication Commission
Corruption Eradication Commission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://www.icac.org.hk/newsl/issue22eng/button3.htm
印度均由反貪委員會KPK(Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi)派員出席ACT會議，KPK是根據印尼第30/2002號法律《印度反貪委員會法》成立的。KPK成立之前，只有印尼警方和檢察官有權執行反貪工作，所根據的法律有兩項：第31/1999號法律《反貪罪行法》（經第20/2001號法修訂），以及第28/1999號法律《國家官員廉正法》。
KPK的職能及權力包括：協調及監管其他有反貪污職能的機構﹔對貪污行為進行預查、調查及檢控工作﹔推行預防工作和監察政府的管理。
KPK通過檢察官辦公室、警方以及多個金融監管機構協調其活動，以便設置有利於反貪匯報制度﹔向有關機構索取反貪工作的資料﹔與有反貪職能的機構進行座談或召開會議以及向有關機構索取預防貪污的報告。
在預防工作方面，KPK負責：核查國家官員的財產﹔ 審查貪污檢舉﹔ 在各級學校推行反貪教育計劃﹔ 設計及推廣社會性消除貪污計劃﹔ 為民眾舉辦反貪活動﹔ 研究所有國家和政府機關的管理制度，旨在改善有關制度以減低潛在的貪污風險。
(資料來源：中國大陸國家預防腐敗局)
7.澳洲:
主要由AUSTRAC, The ACCC, ASIC and APRA這幾個部門來統籌。ACCC, ASIC兩個均為獨立機構。
8.China 中國:監察部
9.ICAC 香港廉政公署
香港自2006開始推動「誠信領導計畫」。
10.Negara Brunei Darussalam 汶萊
The Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB)- established in 1982 http://www.icac.org.hk/newsl/issue33eng/button5.htm
11.美國政府倫理署(U.S.Office of Government Ethics)
有關證人保護法令
In the United States, legal protections vary according to the subject matter of the whistleblowing, and sometimes the state in which the case arises.
Lloyd-La Follette Act (1912)
Water Pollution Control Act (1972)
Safe Drinking Water Act (1974)
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (also called the Solid Waste Disposal Act) (1976)
Toxic Substances Control Act (1976)
Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 (through 1978 amendment to protect nuclear whistleblowers)
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, or the Superfund Law) (1980)
Clean Air Act (1990)
Surface Transportation Assistance Act (1982)
Pipeline Safety Improvement Act (PSIA) (2002)
Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (“AIR 21″)
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002) (for corporate fraud whistleblowers)
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (2010) (for Securities whistleblowers)
Military Whistleblower Protection Act
12. Papua New Guinea
PNG has established the National Fraud and Anti-Corruption Directorate as the main criminal investigation unit that enforces the Criminal Code on fraud and corruption. It works in close liaison with the Police Prosecutions Unit and the Public Prosecutor’s Office.
Guest Member
歐盟反詐騙公署(OLAF)
世界銀行 World Bank
亞洲開發銀行(ADB)及經濟合作暨發展組織(OECD
Transparency International (TI)
The ethics regulations of Chinese Taipei
(1)Ethics Directions for Public Servants:
公務員廉政倫理規範條文(doc檔案)
(2)The Amendment of The Public Servants Assets Disclosure Act:
公職人員財產申報法
(3)The Public Servants Conflict of Interest Prevention ACT: 公職人員利益衝突迴避法
其他組織:
國際反貪污大會 (International Anti-Corruption Conference -- IACC)
http://zh-hk.facebook.com/posted.php?id=254344965260&share_id=321775087463&comments=1
IACC是國際性非官方專業研討會，每兩年舉行一次。它是世界各國、各地區反貪污專家、學者深入研究這一國際社會普遍存在的現象及其對策的重要會議，也是各國和各地區司法人員、政府官員交流經驗、尋求國際合作以遏制貪污現象的重要場所。舉辦宗旨是推動各國及各地區的反貪污工作，預防和懲治貪污犯罪，維護社會穩定和經濟發展。
國際反貪局聯合會(IAACA)
The International Association of Anti-Corruption Authorities (“IAACA”)
APEC 21國:加拿大、美國、智利、墨西哥、秘魯、日本、韓國、Chinese Taipei、菲律賓、汶萊、印尼、巴布亞新磯內亞、澳大利亞、新西蘭、中國、香港、越南、泰國、馬來西亞、新加坡、俄羅斯
整理: By Wan-Li Yang
2009.1.19
rewrite 2010.3.14
1.Korea 韓國: KICAC Korean Independent Commission against Corruption
http://www.kicac.go.kr/PORTAL/Eng/index.jsp
南韓廉政公署 根據2001.1.7反貪污法，南韓廉政公署於2002.1.25成立。南韓廉政公署共有九位委員，並由其中一人擔任主席。九位委員分別由總統、國會及最高法院首席法官各舉薦三人出任，每人任期三年，之後可獲委連任。南韓廉政公署的行政與運作由秘書處負責，其下設有政策規劃處、公共關係及協作局、舉報審查局及15個其他部門。目前，南韓廉政公署的僱員合共139人。
南韓廉政公署是一個獨立運作的機構，以不偏不倚的態度致力防止貪污。工作範圍包括處理貪污舉報、研究體制改革措施、制定反貪政策及評估其成效，以及舉辦教育及宣傳活動。
南韓廉政公署的網站 (http://www.kicac.go.kr/)。
積極參與國際反貪工作。2002.11南韓廉政公署主辦了首屆「反貪機構研討會」，與來自澳洲、香港、馬來西亞及新加坡的反貪機構代表，分享打擊貪污的經驗和心得。
「亞太經合組織會議2005」於韓國舉行。為了把反貪議題納入APEC議程，南韓廉政公署於是建議在2005召開首次「反貪專家小組會議」(ACT)。亞太經合組織成員國領袖於2003年的領袖宣言中，承諾會致力提高透明度及打擊貪污；各成員國大可利用「反貪專家小組會議」的機會，商討實現承諾的方法。
2. Thailand 泰國 :NCCC, Thailand National Counter Corruption Commission (NCCC)
http://www.icac.org.hk/newsl/issue22eng/button2.htm
3.Singapore 新加坡:Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau http://app.cpib.gov.sg/newcpib/user/default.aspx?pgID=21
4.Malaysia 馬來西亞: the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC)
Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission - Wikipedia, the free ...
證人保護法相關法案:
The Whistleblower Protection Act 2010, formulated to curb corruption, had been implemented on December 15 2010. 證人保護法英文全文： http://www.bheuu.gov.my/pdf/Akta/Act%20711.pdf
5.Indonesia 印尼 : Corruption Eradication Commission
Corruption Eradication Commission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://www.icac.org.hk/newsl/issue22eng/button3.htm
印度均由反貪委員會KPK(Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi)派員出席ACT會議，KPK是根據印尼第30/2002號法律《印度反貪委員會法》成立的。KPK成立之前，只有印尼警方和檢察官有權執行反貪工作，所根據的法律有兩項：第31/1999號法律《反貪罪行法》（經第20/2001號法修訂），以及第28/1999號法律《國家官員廉正法》。
KPK的職能及權力包括：協調及監管其他有反貪污職能的機構﹔對貪污行為進行預查、調查及檢控工作﹔推行預防工作和監察政府的管理。
KPK通過檢察官辦公室、警方以及多個金融監管機構協調其活動，以便設置有利於反貪匯報制度﹔向有關機構索取反貪工作的資料﹔與有反貪職能的機構進行座談或召開會議以及向有關機構索取預防貪污的報告。
在預防工作方面，KPK負責：核查國家官員的財產﹔ 審查貪污檢舉﹔ 在各級學校推行反貪教育計劃﹔ 設計及推廣社會性消除貪污計劃﹔ 為民眾舉辦反貪活動﹔ 研究所有國家和政府機關的管理制度，旨在改善有關制度以減低潛在的貪污風險。
(資料來源：中國大陸國家預防腐敗局)
7.澳洲:
主要由AUSTRAC, The ACCC, ASIC and APRA這幾個部門來統籌。ACCC, ASIC兩個均為獨立機構。
8.China 中國:監察部
9.ICAC 香港廉政公署
香港自2006開始推動「誠信領導計畫」。
10.Negara Brunei Darussalam 汶萊
The Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB)- established in 1982 http://www.icac.org.hk/newsl/issue33eng/button5.htm
11.美國政府倫理署(U.S.Office of Government Ethics)
有關證人保護法令
In the United States, legal protections vary according to the subject matter of the whistleblowing, and sometimes the state in which the case arises.
Lloyd-La Follette Act (1912)
Water Pollution Control Act (1972)
Safe Drinking Water Act (1974)
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (also called the Solid Waste Disposal Act) (1976)
Toxic Substances Control Act (1976)
Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 (through 1978 amendment to protect nuclear whistleblowers)
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, or the Superfund Law) (1980)
Clean Air Act (1990)
Surface Transportation Assistance Act (1982)
Pipeline Safety Improvement Act (PSIA) (2002)
Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (“AIR 21″)
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002) (for corporate fraud whistleblowers)
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (2010) (for Securities whistleblowers)
Military Whistleblower Protection Act
12. Papua New Guinea
PNG has established the National Fraud and Anti-Corruption Directorate as the main criminal investigation unit that enforces the Criminal Code on fraud and corruption. It works in close liaison with the Police Prosecutions Unit and the Public Prosecutor’s Office.
Guest Member
歐盟反詐騙公署(OLAF)
世界銀行 World Bank
亞洲開發銀行(ADB)及經濟合作暨發展組織(OECD
Transparency International (TI)
The ethics regulations of Chinese Taipei
(1)Ethics Directions for Public Servants:
公務員廉政倫理規範條文(doc檔案)
(2)The Amendment of The Public Servants Assets Disclosure Act:
公職人員財產申報法
(3)The Public Servants Conflict of Interest Prevention ACT: 公職人員利益衝突迴避法
其他組織:
國際反貪污大會 (International Anti-Corruption Conference -- IACC)
http://zh-hk.facebook.com/posted.php?id=254344965260&share_id=321775087463&comments=1
IACC是國際性非官方專業研討會，每兩年舉行一次。它是世界各國、各地區反貪污專家、學者深入研究這一國際社會普遍存在的現象及其對策的重要會議，也是各國和各地區司法人員、政府官員交流經驗、尋求國際合作以遏制貪污現象的重要場所。舉辦宗旨是推動各國及各地區的反貪污工作，預防和懲治貪污犯罪，維護社會穩定和經濟發展。
國際反貪局聯合會(IAACA)
The International Association of Anti-Corruption Authorities (“IAACA”)
APEC 21國:加拿大、美國、智利、墨西哥、秘魯、日本、韓國、Chinese Taipei、菲律賓、汶萊、印尼、巴布亞新磯內亞、澳大利亞、新西蘭、中國、香港、越南、泰國、馬來西亞、新加坡、俄羅斯
整理: By Wan-Li Yang
2009.1.19
rewrite 2010.3.14
訂閱：
文章 (Atom)